Why all this panic? Are they afraid Trey Gowdy will prove the President lied? Doesn't everybody already know that?
No, methinks they doth protest too much. There's something deeper – something far more sinister they are trying to keep covered up.
The Canadian Press reported early on that the CIA was in Benghazi shipping arms through Turkey to the Syrian rebels. That would shed light on why Chris Stevens left Tripoli, where the walls have eyes and ears, and went to Benghazi the night of 11 September to meet there with the Turkish ambassador. What they discussed, we don't know.
But we do know that following that discussion and the departure of the Turkish ambassador, the CIA compound in Benghazi underwent a concerted, nine-hour military attack. This was not a terrorist attack. This was not a bunch of rag heads with AK-47s playing the Arab version of cowboys and Indians. This was a coordinated, planned attack by well trained professional soldiers with professional weapons.
We also know that, while we had ample forces available to repel such an attack in Italy, Tripoli, and other mid-east positions, we not only did not deploy them – we actually told them to "stand down" when they had been deployed!
We also know that, after the attack, the FBI did not even investigate the site of the attack for more than four weeks.
What was the Obama administration doing in Benghazi? What was there that needed five weeks to cleanse from the site before letting the FBI in to investigate? Why did they refuse to send available and eager aid to the defenders of Benghazi? And whose military forces were they that attacked Benghazi that night? And why? And why are Benghazi survivors sworn to secrecy and given routine lie detector tests to make sure they haven't squeeled?
Could it be Benghazi is only the tip of the ice berg? Is the United States covertly arming Muslim militias all over the world? Are there scores, maybe hundreds, of Benghazi throughout the world engaged in this treasonous activity? Did Hillary Clinton refuse to put Boko Haram on a terrorist list because it would impede our ability to supply them with arms?
Do we have a President of the United States who is willfully and deliberately furnishing arms to the sworn and radical enemies of the country he took an oath to protect?
He did it again in 2012 when he said of his campaign, "We've been in every State but two now. Fifty-seven? I think, one to go." That sounds like gibberish unless you understand the current structure of Islam. There are fifty-seven Islamic states in the Council of Islamic Organizations, the "united states" of Islam. And the "one to go" is obviously Palestine.
Low information Americans, sitting on their couches in ignorance and apathy, shrugged when they didn't understand what the President said and reached for another potato chip. But every Muslim in the world knew exactly what he said!
What very few Americans understand is that to a Muslim, Ummah, the brotherhood of all Muslims, is one of the most powerful incentives in his universe. He is required by Ummah to assist other Muslims in whatever endeavors they may be involved. This of course includes "righteous" jihad against infidels! If Muslims need guns and ammunition to slaughter innocent Christians in Africa or Syria or Egypt, the President of the United States, as a Muslim, is required by his religion to give them guns and ammunition to slaughter Christians!
Think about that for a moment.
As a Muslim, Obama is not deterred from his Ummah responsibility by the oath he took to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, which was taken under Taquia and doesn't count in any case. Nor does any consideration of national allegiance compare in importance to the overriding responsibility of a Muslim to help his fellow Muslims, of whatever nationality they may be.
I think you will agree that the circumstantial evidence seems irrefutable. It only remains for Trey Gowdy to present concrete proof. But Trey Gowdy and the House Select Committee also need us to support them and to act on their findings. As Americans, we can no longer afford to be comfortable. Our Republic is under attack – and it is under attack from the inside. There is a python in the hen house. Are we going to let it eat the chickens or are we going to get off our ass and get the flashlight and the shotgun?